herostill.blogg.se

Xbox one controller mac os x el capitan
Xbox one controller mac os x el capitan









  1. #XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN UPDATE#
  2. #XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN UPGRADE#
  3. #XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN SOFTWARE#
  4. #XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN WINDOWS#

You don't realise just how clunky and awkward 10.6 is until you go back to it after using ML onwards for a while (i have still 10.6 on my old Mini).

#XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN UPGRADE#

I'll give you several reasons to upgrade from 10.6: SMB: I use it daily, no apparent issues (ditto NFS). Sorry if I don't gush over the the stupid mission control blurriness and task switching, or a new font Simple stuff like that which needs to work and is used every day in workflows Like SMB, WIFI wonkiness, network & DNS issues, and mail with gmail. Ha down vote away, the truth hurts when people look past eye candy and useless features and point out things that still are not better with the OS and have not been improved for years.ĭownvoted for winging about downvoting before anyone had actually downvoted you.Īlso because you seem to think that your version of 'the truth' is somehow universal.

xbox one controller mac os x el capitan

I don't see a reason to upgrade from 10.6. I hope the next major version looks better, at least. Maps is almost as good as Google Maps, Notes is a little bit closer to being as good as Evernote, Mail doesn't do the advanced filtering I rely on in Gmail. I still can't see any reason to upgrade from Mavericks.Īll the app updates are basically useless also-rans. On the other hand, this long-standing problem with OS X has prompted a post-production studio to switch to windows, so I guess it is.ĭamn. On one hand, I feel like this isn't directly relevant to a review of El Capitan. Anything more I can add will only show up my technical ignorance.

#XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN WINDOWS#

The windows machines work fine, the Macs are fine with AFP talking to a Mac server, but when you have an OS X machine talking to a NAS with SMB as the only option then large directories kill performance. I don't think I can provide any specific details, but this isn't like having a glitch at work for a day - this is a constant, ongoing saga. Many things have been tried and benchmarked including nfs, which didn't do much better. I'm not directly involved in the IT stuff but since the latest storage unit they added doesn't do AFP I've been overhearing lots of conversations. Yes, but they've also tried rolling back to SMB 1 which made no difference. And anyway, it's not just me - it only takes a simple google search to find years of complaints about the dreadful performance of SMB with the last few OS X releases.ĭo you know if this is SMB 2? Apple adopted that as the default for file sharing recently over its own AFP. It is definitely something that is broken. In one case we had an image sequence that took over half an hour just to open. I guess not everyone is dealing with directories that have thousands of jpg or tiffs in them, but for those of us who do the difference in performance is huge. While I'm not directly involved in IT I've done some basic benchmarking and Windows is 6 - 10 x faster than Yosemite when opening large image sequences. Actual transfer speed over SMB of files is generally very good to excellent.īut applications are seriously affected. SMB directory listings have always been slow. When you have a high speed NAS that doesn't support AFP it is cheaper to replace the computers than it is to replace the storage infrastructure. One company I work for is giving up on Apple and transitioning their entire office to Windows specifically because of the awful performance of SMB on OS X. Things might be working ok at the moment, but it's clearly Apple's stated goal to require certs. Yet they continue to work.ĭavid Yoo is abandoning Sessions because of the changes. The certs have long since expired and the domain they were on is gone. To request a certificate, follow the “Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles” link from the Developer Member Center homepage.Īnd I am still using extensions from Safari 5 days in 10.11. After joining the program, you must obtain a signed certificate in order for your extension to work the extension will not load until your certificate is installed. Important: To develop extensions for Safari, you need to sign up for the Apple Developer Program online at.

#XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN UPDATE#

Otherwise you have to manually update each one by clicking update in Safari's preferences.

xbox one controller mac os x el capitan

Hmm? It doesn't require a paid membership to side load extensions. Now that really would be a walled garden.

#XBOX ONE CONTROLLER MAC OS X EL CAPITAN SOFTWARE#

Sure, it gets rid of all the adware crap in one fell swoop, but - is it the thin end of the wedge? Might we see ALL software of any kind only launching on OS X if you're a subscribing developer? I'm a little troubled by Apple's ruling that Safari Extensions will only load while your developer certificate is paid-up.











Xbox one controller mac os x el capitan